If you care about the answer to the question above, you're in the wrong place. (So often that happens to people who arrive here through search engines...)
One of my writers was searching through blog feeds and news items this afternoon and suddenly read aloud: Mary Louise Parker Not a Fan of Snakes.
None of us much cared, but we were entertained enough by the headline that we spent a few minutes tossing out other related headlines and possible Googles searches related to those headlines. Little did we know, at the time, that the snake story was really about MARY LOUISE PARKER NAKED.
That, apparently, was no big deal. She says in the article that she's been naked a lot. Apparently, this was her first time getting naked with a snake.*
The thing is, when I went back to look for the article to write this post, it turns out that there are pages and pages and pages of articles about Mary Louise Parker getting naked with a snake. I guess, in retrospect, I have to give this particular article credit for leaving "naked" out of the headline.
*Please, please, please do not let there be search traffic for the phrase "naked with a snake. Please.
Friday, August 17, 2007
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
2 comments:
I'm SO tempted now to go google "naked with a snake" to see what all it brings up besides (hopefully) this article! ;)
I don't think, though, that I'm honestly up to seeing what would happen if I did.
Maybe I'll save that for another day.. ;)
I am no Mary Louise Parker, but I think a lot of women have been naked with snakes. And didn't like it.
--Margo S.
Post a Comment